Re: > 2TB ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No email <null@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Forgive me as this is probably a silly question and one that has been
> answered many times, I have tried to search for the answers but have
> ended up more confused than when I started.  So thought maybe I could
> ask the community to put me out of my misery
> 
> Is there a version of MD that can create larger than 2TB raid sets?  

Hmm ...  with 1KB blocks, and at 32 bits, 2^32 * 1KB = 4TB would be the
notional limit of any block device counted in blocks and using a 32bit
counter.

But in the 2.6 kernel the counter is 64bit.

> Obviously with 400GB drives being commonplace a typical 12 bay solution
> is capable of significant capacity,

3.6TB under raid0 or linear?

> but if we need to split this down
> into multiple raid sets, then we start to lose.  

I don't see that you have to on general principle even on a 2.4 kernel,
but maybe there are extra limits in the case of md devices over block
devices that I do not know about.

> So, if anyone can advise me as to MD / Linux size limitations I would be
> grateful :)

Well, I don't have anything to add to the observation above and I'm too
lazy to look! But where do you get the "2TB" number from? I can believe
that as a number for 1KB block devices in general in early 2.4 kernel
times, before signage had been dealt with.

Peter

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux