RE: Software RAID 0+1 with mdadm.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This bug that's fixed in 1.9.0, is in a bug when you create the array?  ie
do we need to use 1.9.0 to create the array.  I'm looking to do the same but
my bootdisk currently only has 1.7.soemthing on it.  Do I need to make a
custom bootcd with 1.9.0 on it?

Thanks,
-ryan

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Luca Berra
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 9:17 AM
To: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Software RAID 0+1 with mdadm.


On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 02:28:21PM -0800, Brad Dameron wrote:
>Everything seems ok after boot. But again no /dev/md0 in /proc/mdstat.
>But then if I do a mdadm --assemble --scan it will then load /dev/md0.
there is a bug in mdadm, see my mail "patches for mdadm 1.8.0" or wait
for 1.9.0

L.

--
Luca Berra -- bluca@xxxxxxxxxx
        Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
 /"\
 \ /     ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
  X        AGAINST HTML MAIL
 / \
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux