Re: raid5 performance after upgrade to 2.4.28

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Did values change in /proc/sys/vm/{min,max}-readahead?

http://lists.us.dell.com/pipermail/linux-poweredge/2004-February/036166.html


Guy wrote:
Now the bad news...

I have 2 CPUs  P3-500Mhz, 512Meg ram.  So I ran 2 bonnies at the same time.

Kernel 2.4.20-8 with 2 Bonnies at the same time:
Version  1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
              -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine  Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
watkins-ho 1G  3091  85 18593  44  9733  24  3443  97 59895  60 249.6   6
watkins-ho 1G  2980  87 21176  54 10167  23  3478  99 44525  44 384.2   9
               ----     -----     -----      ----    ------     -----
Total          6071     39769     19900      6921    104420     633.8

Kernel 2.4.28 with 2 Bonnies at the same time:
watkins-ho 1G  4456  92 17922  52  6489  17  4961  96 26571  32 320.4  12
watkins-ho 1G  4343  89 17987  52  6197  17  4946  96 25646  31 363.7   7
               ----     -----     -----      ----    ------     -----
Total          8799     35909     12686      9907     52217     684.1

Very odd, the sequential read speed is almost exactly 1/2 now.

Oh well, I still can't tell without a tool to measure the speed.
But I still don't like it!

My network is only 100BaseT, so it is still well beyond that!

Guy

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Guy
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 1:17 AM
To: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: raid5 performance after upgrade to 2.4.28

About 1 month ago I upgraded from Kernel 2.4.20-8 to 2.4.28.
Today I noticed my sequential read speed is up by about 12%.

I don't recall making any other changes that would affect speed.
So, I guess the Kernel upgrade made the difference.

An old bonnie output:
Version  1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
              -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine  Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
watkins-ho 1G  3293  97 34587  89 22306  53  3549  99 67492  63 500.1   9

Today:
watkins-ho 1G  4944  99 31719  65 18538  43  5184  98 75440  71 602.5   8
               ^^^^                          ^^^^     ^^^^^     ^^^^^

Some things improved, others decreased.

Of course, no change I can notice on my own.
I needed to measure performance to notice.

I guess I should try Kernel 2.6 some day.

Guy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux