Hi, I dont know whats up with the "VERS = 9000" output, but its definitively from mdadm, as it's been present at every attempt at creating the array. However, I've upgraded to the 2.4.28 kernel and that made no difference, but issuing mdadm -Cf /dev/md0 -l5 -n8 -c256 /dev/hd[e-l]1 (note the "f" made all my problems go away, the array is now fully operational) And for the stripe size, thats just an performance experiment, seems like 256 was the winner in the end though. I can try to recreate the problem later today if the output of mdadm -D /dev/md0 is of any interest in finding out if this is a bug or just me. (It should also be mentioned that the older version of mdadm that shipped with slackware 10 also produced the same problem) -Bjorn On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 22:24:27 -0500, Guy <bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From 1.8.1: > This is a "development" release of mdadm. It should *not* be > considered stable and should be used primarily for testing. > The current "stable" version is 1.8.0. > > Your email shows "VERS = 9000". Was that a command line option? Or output > from mdadm? > > The only other odd thing I see... You have the largest chunk size I have > seen (-c512). But I don't know of any limits. > > I did create an array with this command line. No problems. > mdadm -C /dev/md3 -l5 -n8 -c512 /dev/ram[0-7] > > from cat /proc/mdstat: > md3 : active raid5 [dev 01:07][7] [dev 01:06][6] [dev 01:05][5] [dev > 01:04][4] [dev 01:03][3] [dev 01:02][2] [dev 01:01][1] [dev 01:00][0] > 25088 blocks level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [8/8] [UUUUUUUU] > > Send output of: > mdadm -D /dev/md0 > > I am using mdadm V1.8.0 and kernel 2.4.28. > > Guy > > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bjørn Eikeland > Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 8:39 PM > To: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: raid 5 created with 7 out of 8 > > Hi, I'm trying to set up a raid5 array using 8 ide drives ( > /dev/hd[e-l] ) but I'm having a hard time. > > I'm using slackware 10, kernel 2.4.26 and madm 1.8.1 (downloading > 2.4.28 overnight now) > > The problem is mdadm creates the array with 7 of 8 drives up and > running and the last as a spare and does not start recovering with the > spare. And it will not let me remove it and re-add it. Below follows a > script output of the whole thing (less repartitioning the drives and > zero'ing any remaining superblocks) > > Any help will be greatly appreciated. > -thanks > > root@filebear:~# mdadm -C /dev/md0 -l5 -n8 -c512 /dev/hd[e-l]1 > VERS = 9000 > mdadm: array /dev/md0 started. > root@filebear:~# cat /proc/mdstat > Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] > read_ahead 1024 sectors > md0 : active raid5 hdl1[8] hdk1[6] hdj1[5] hdi1[4] hdh1[3] hdg1[2] > hdf1[1] hde1[0] > 1094017792 blocks level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [8/7] [UUUUUUU_] > > unused devices: <none> > root@filebear:~# mdadm /dev/md0 -f /dev/hdl1 > mdadm: set /dev/hdl1 faulty in /dev/md0 > root@filebear:~# mdadm /dev/md0 -r /dev/hdl > mdadm: hot removed /dev/hdl1 > root@filebear:~# mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/hdl1 > mdadm: hot add failed for /dev/hdl1: No space left on device > root@filebear:~# mdadm /dev/md0 -f /dev/hde1 > mdadm: set /dev/hde1 faulty in /dev/md0 > root@filebear:~# mdadm /dev/md0 -r /dev/hde1 > mdadm: hot removed /dev/hde1 > root@filebear:~# mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/hde1 > mdadm: hot add failed for /dev/hde1: No space left on device > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
