RE: Spares and partitioning huge disks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Maarten,
	I was thinking again!

You plan on using an 80 gig disk as a spare disk.  2 40 Gig partitions.  If
both spares end up in the same RAID5 array, that would be bad!  mdadm
supports spare groups, you should create 2 groups, put 1 spare partition in
each group.  Then put 1/2 of your RAID5 arrays in each group.

Guy

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of maarten
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 7:19 AM
To: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Spares and partitioning huge disks

On Saturday 08 January 2005 11:22, Mario Holbe wrote:
> Guy <bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Each of his six RAID5 arrays will only use 1 partition of each physical
> > disk.
> > His plan is to combine the 6 arrays with LVM or a linear array.
>
> Ah, I just missed that part, sorry & thanks :)
> I agree with you then - it's something like a RAID5+0 (analogue
> to RAID1+0) then and it *should* work just fine :)

Yes, it should.  And the array does indeed work, but I'm plagued with a host

of other -unrelated- problems now. :-(
First, I had to upgrade from kernel 2.4 to 2.6 because I lacked a driver for

my SATA card.  That was quite complicated as there is no official support to

run 2.6 kernels on Suse 9.0. It also entailed migrating to lvm2 as lvm is
not 
part of 2.6.  But as it turns out, the 2.6 kernel I eventually installed
does 
somehow not initialize my bttv cards correctly and also ALSA has problems.  
So now I'm reverting back to a 2.4 kernel which should support SATA, version

2.4.28, which I'm building as we speak from vanilla kernel sources...
But that has a lot of hurdles too, and I'd still have to find an ALSA driver

for that as well.  Worse, I fear that I will have to migrate back to lvm1
now 
too, so that means copying all the 200 Gig data _again_, which by itself 
takes about 10 hours... :-(
Ah, if only I would have bought ATA disks instead of SATA !
I've thought about putting the disks in another system and just use them
over 
NFS, but that would mean another system that is powered for 24/7, and that 
gets to be a bit much.  Reinstalling from scratch with a 9.1 / 2.6 distro is

a worse option still, as mythtv carries such a bucket full of obscure 
dependencies I'd hate to install all that again. 

In other words, I'm not there yet, but at least that has little or nothing
to 
do with lvm or md.  But this does 'suck' a lot.

Maarten

-- 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux