RE: swp - Re: ext3 journal on software raid (was Re: PROBLEM: Kernel 2.6.10 crashing repeatedly and hard)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



HAY!  DON'T CALL ME GRANDPA!!!!  Not for a few more years at least!

:)

And I was there!  And beyond!  My first home computer had a 4K card and an
8K card, if I recall.  It was 6800 based.  I wonder if I still have it?  I
did use punch cards in college!  Some computers had core memory, but no tube
based computers.  I am not that old!!!

In the days of my 486-33, I paid $400 for 16Meg of RAM.  The price doubled
just after that when the only epoxy plant burned down or something.  Now my
video card has 64Meg of RAM!  My first hard disk to break the $1 per meg
boundary was a Maxtor 340Meg, cost me about $320.  Now we are under the $1
per Gig boundary.  Today, disk drives are so cheap you get 1 in a happy
meal. :)  Today, I guess disk space is 50-100 times cheaper per gig than
RAM.

Ouch!  At the prices listed above, 1 gig of RAM would cost $25,000, and a
250Gig disk would cost $235,294.  The price of RAM has dropped by 250 times.
The price of disk drives dropped by over 1000 times.  The future is going to
be so cool!

You said memory was 10x the cost of disks.  In the example above, memory is
25x more than disk.  Today it is about 100x.  Maybe we should be swapping
even more, now?  :)

Guy

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alvin Oga
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 12:04 AM
To: Mike Hardy
Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: swp - Re: ext3 journal on software raid (was Re: PROBLEM:
Kernel 2.6.10 crashing repeatedly and hard)



On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Mike Hardy wrote:

> There are those that think if they size the machine correctly, they 
> shouldn't need swap, and they're right.

bingo
 
> > I had 8 Meg of swap space.  So 12 meg total available virtual memory.
> > One day I added 16 Meg of RAM.  So now I had 20 Meg of RAM.  I deleted
my
> > swap space.  Everyone told me I needed 20-40 Meg of swap space now!
Swap
> > space should be 2 time RAM size.  How crazy, my memory requirements did
not
> > change, just the amount of memory.  I used that system for a year or so
like
> > that.  Go figure!

the silly rule of 2x size of RAM == swap space came from the old days
when memory was 10x the costs of disks or some silly cost performance
that it made sense when grandpa was floating around

by todays ram and disk pricing ... and cpu speeds ...2x memory sorta
goes out the door

c ya
alvin

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux