Re: mdadm segfault

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neil Brown wrote:

Why don't people read the release notes?

Do you really need to ask? :)


From "ANNOUNCE-1.8.1":

   This is a "development" release of mdadm.  It should *not* be
   considered stable and should be used primarily for testing.
   The current "stable" version is 1.8.0.


I guess I should release a "1.9.0" and use "1.8.2 ..." for devel releases.

It might be an idea to create "dev" and "production" branches.

Personally, I read the original 1.8.1 announcement on this list and stayed with 1.8.0, but I can see how others, accustomed to the usual high quality of your releases would think that 1.8.1 would be as stable as 1.8.0.

How about 1.x.y-dev or 1.x.y-bzz (eg b20 b=beta)?

R.
--
http://robinbowes.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux