Re: mdadm problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jean-Yves Mertès wrote:

Hello!

I do not know if I may receive any support about mdadm through this e-mail address. If not, please, could you forward this message to the appropriate box if one exists.

I am currently trying to migrate a Linux partition (Mandrake 10) to RAID 1. To this purpose I have installed mdadm V1.8.1.

This is an experimental version:

This is a "development" release of mdadm.  It should *not* be
considered stable and should be used primarily for testing.
The current "stable" version is 1.8.0.


The first attempt was to configure an equally-sized partition of my second disk (/dev/hdb) as part of a degraded RAID 1 device. Unfortunately, starting the array fails. The following shows pieces of information that should help understanding the case:

The command I use is:
mdadm -C /dev/md0 --metadata=1 --level=raid1 --raid-devices=2 missing /dev/hdb5 -v


To which mdadm answers:
mdadm: /dev/hdb5 appears to contain an ext2fs file system
   size=4843912K  mtime=Thu Dec  2 17:11:54 2004
mdadm: /dev/hdb5 appears to be part of a raid array:
   level=1 devices=2 ctime=Sat Dec  4 18:28:46 2004
mdadm: size set to 4843904K
Continue creating array? y
VERS = 9000
mdadm: ADD_NEW_DISK for /dev/hdb5 failed: Invalid argument

_possibly_ because

Version 1 superblocks requires 2.6.10 or a recent 2.6.10-rc snapshot


Try agin with 1.8.0 and if you have probs then yell :)

HTH
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux