RE: raid5 code ok with 2TB + ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I use dd to test disks, and arrays.  Give this a test.  It may stop at the
2TB limit, not sure.  My monster 14 disk array is only about 240G.

time dd if=/dev/md0 of=/dev/null bs=1024k

I don't think badblocks would detect bad block on an array.  If one did
occur, the drive would be failed and the array would continue.  If your
re-sync finishes, that really does test your disks since every block used by
md is read or written.

Guy

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephan van Hienen
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 6:35 PM
To: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: raid5 code ok with 2TB + ?

On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Stephan van Hienen wrote:

> now running a resync
> after that i'll run badblocks on it to test if i can read/write to the 
> complete array

resync finished without any problems
i wanted to run badblocks on the /dev/md0 to check
but it looks like badblocks doesn't support 2TB + :

]# badblocks -sw -p99 -c8192 /dev/md0
Writing pattern 0xaaaaaaaa:                    126464/-2009266944

any other hints for testing the raid ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux