On Oct 7, 2004, at 6:24 PM, Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday October 7, gerti@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Now when md starts it accepts sda1, kicks off sdb1 as outdated, and
never seems to even look at sdc1. Hence it will not start the array.
Let me guess: You are using "raidstart" to start the array.
Don't. It doesn't work.
Use "mdadm". It does.
Actually in the first round of tests I used mdadm, and in the same
situation it just segfaults.
Well, that is something I can help with.
Can you try again and get an 'strace' showing where the segfault is,
or a gdb stacktrace from the core file??
I tested some more, I must have made a mistake earlier (maybe mixed
some raidtools command in). mdadm indeed masters that scenario fine.
Apologies to Neil!
Gerd
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
