On Thursday October 7, gerti@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> Now when md starts it accepts sda1, kicks off sdb1 as outdated, and > >> never seems to even look at sdc1. Hence it will not start the array. > > > > Let me guess: You are using "raidstart" to start the array. > > Don't. It doesn't work. > > Use "mdadm". It does. > > > Actually in the first round of tests I used mdadm, and in the same > situation it just segfaults. > Well, that is something I can help with. Can you try again and get an 'strace' showing where the segfault is, or a gdb stacktrace from the core file?? NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
