Re: new superblock and raid10 support in mdadm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday September 14, thunder7@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 11:08:53AM +1000
> > A new format is being supported because the old format has problems.
> > One is that it cannot work with devices larger than 2 Gigabytes (and I
> > have had a request from someone who wanted to include such a device in
> > an MD array).
> 
> I presume you mean terabyte, but I'm not sure you don't mean petabyte or
> something else very large?

Yes.  terabyte (2^(32+9) bytes is the max size)
> 
> > The raid10 module is in 2.4.9-rc2 and will be in 2.4.9 when it gets
> > released. 
> 
> 2.6.9 I presume?

You presume correctly.  I type poorly :-)

> >  * near_copies and far_copies must be at least one, and there product is at most
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------their
> 

Would you believe that I deliberately put in those errors just to see
if anyone actually reads these comments..... no, I wouldn't either.

Thanks,
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux