Re: Concatenation with redundancy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday September 7, nicoya@xxxxxx wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Recently I've seen a growing trend in creating very ad-hoc storage 
> arrays for storing large quantities of media files (videos, music, 
> etc). These arrays are usually initially created with a small number of 
> concatenated drives, say 2 or 3, but over time can easily grow to span 
> 6 or 8 drives as personal budgets allow.
...
> 
> 
> So, am I smoking crack here? Does anyone think this would be worth 
> implementing? Has this already been implemented and I just haven't seen 
> it?

I don't know if it has been implemented, though it's not known on
Linux.
I am planning to do something like that eventually, but not until I
have written a filesystem that would make good use of it (it's
planned, but work is slow).

I hadn't thought of allowing drives to be different sizes.  It would
complicate some aspects, but it could be made to work... I guess.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux