RE: Scrub?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Furthermore, drives (including those with SMART support) only
reallocate bad blocks following write errors. A scrub/verify tool
would be looking for read errors and would need to actively replace
the unreadable block with rudundant data from a _different_ drive.

Actually, I guess it would be kind of complicated. A scan for
unreadable blocks would need to occur outside of the md layer (to
prevent the errors from triggering a degraded state), yet the block
replacement would need to occur through the md layer, since only md
knows how to recreate the block from parity. It would probably be a
easier for a RAID 1 array where the disks are symetric and you could
guess the location of the redundant block on the second volume. You
would probably need to use md on a RAID 5 array.

-Kanoa

On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, Salyzyn, Mark wrote:

> Problem with running the relocation is that the RAID-5 will now be
> corrupt. The RAID-5 algorithm needs to be in-touch with disk block
> relocation so that it can correct the parity and the data.
>
> Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dean gaudet [mailto:dean-list-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 5:59 PM
> To: Kanoa Withington
> Cc: Salyzyn, Mark; Derek Listmail Acct; linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Scrub?
>
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Kanoa Withington wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> > > Just reading the entire array should correct the bad blocks, so
> reverse
> > > the sense of the dd:
> > >
> > > 	dd if=/dev/md0 of=/dev/null bs=200b
> > >
> > > to find and replace the bad blocks (making the assumption that md
> works
> > > like the H/W RAID cards).
> >
> > In this case software RAID does not work like the H/W cards. Finding
> > an unreadable block that way in a software array would cause it to go
> > into a degraded state.
>
> if the disks support SMART (i.e. they're less than a few years old) then
> try running the smart long selftest... it can be done online and on many
> disks it will force sector reallocation (and produce a SMART log event
> so
> you know it happenned).
>
> get smartmontools and run "smartctl -a" to see info on your drive, and
> "smartctl -t long" to launch the long test.  man page has more examples.
>
> i run smart long tests on each my disks once a week (staggerred over
> many
> nights)... see /etc/smartd.conf.
>
> -dean
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux