Re: Q: RAID-1 w/2x160GB, ReiserFS, Debian "woody", homebrew 2.4.25 kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Jens Benecke wrote:

> The goal is to have as "stress free" a system as possible - i.e. with as
> little manual configuration, and in event of emergencies, as little work to
> do, as possible.

You probably should go for hardware RAID1 instead, this will present the
drive as a single drive to the OS and will handle all failure scenarios, 
you will not be hindered by fixing LILO to boot etc. Yes, it'll cost a bit 
more but if your goal is simplicity and carefree running, this is probably 
the best way.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@xxxxxxxxx

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux