Re: mount-by-label finds drive not array ????

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:33:13PM +0100, robin-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

/dev/md0 /mnt/bar ext3 defaults 0 4

Since if I do it by "LABEL=", it tries to mount hda1, not md0!

Is this just a known/accepted brain-deadness of the mount code?

Tom,

I'm just considering doing something like this.

Did you ever get any resolution to this issue?
is there any need to mount a md device by label, since you can already
identify the md components by uuid when you assemble the raid.

L.

--
Luca Berra -- bluca@xxxxxxxxxx
       Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ /     ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
 X        AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux