> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Oehser > Sent: 01 July 2004 11:41 > To: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: mount-by-label finds drive not array ???? > > > Hi, > > I'm accustomed to doing something like: > > LABEL=tomsvol2 /mnt/foo ext3 defaults 0 2 > > But if I do that on my raid-5 md arrays, it tries to mount > disk 1 of the 4 disks that make up the array! Apparently, > the first stripe has enough of the filesystem that it must be > thinking that is what to mount! Even with type "FD"!!! > > So, with an array /dev/md0 made of hda1 hdb1 hdc1 hdd1, I am > having to do a literal: > > /dev/md0 /mnt/bar ext3 defaults 0 4 > > Since if I do it by "LABEL=", it tries to mount hda1, not md0! > > Is this just a known/accepted brain-deadness of the mount code? Tom, I'm just considering doing something like this. Did you ever get any resolution to this issue? Thanks, R. -- http://robinbowes.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html