Re: Raid 5: Lossless music archive server recommendations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I have a system that uses drives on all channels, eg master/slave.
> and I have encountered any slowdown, by using primary and secondary disks
> in the same channel.
> Yes it is slower, but for me performance is good enough.

With two drives per channel, doesn't a disk failure pull down the other
drive, causing the entire array to fail, and require a reboot to bring the
degraded array back online?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux