> you imply that vendors are knowingly shipping half their product > that will die within even a 1yr warranty period, and then have > to be replaced at significant cost to the vendor. I really can't > see why you think they're so stupid! the alternate explanation, > which fits the data (such as it is) perfectly well is that the > supply chain damages the drives. I don't believe that theory, because Maxtor has replaced some of our failed drives, directly, and the replacements also failed in less than a year. It takes a lot of time for an end-user to do an RMA. With drives costing around $100, it's much cheaper to buy a new drive and replace it than to go through the drive manufacturer's RMA process. I don't believe drive manufacturers are stupid at all... One thing the drive manufacturers could do to help is publish MTBF figures for a range of duty cycles. If they say "this drive will fail in 8 months if you do an average of 50 seeks per second throughout the day", then people will know that the drives may not be up to the task. Or "this drive will last 15 years if you just turn it on and never access it." Jim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
