Re: Missing capacity in a RAID 5 array?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Morrow wrote:
I've created a software RAID 5 array consisting of 8 160 GB drives. One of the drives had prior data I wanted to keep, so I first created a 7-drive array, copied the data from the original drive to the array, then added the 8th drive using raidreconf. Worked like a charm (took about 27 hours, though!)

The OS now reports that the total capacity on /dev/md0 is about 920 GB:

/dev/md0 923029884 172872252 750157632 19% /mnt/store

Now, even if we take into account that the drives are 160 decimal GB, which equates to 149 binary GB, my array should still have a total capacity somewhere around 7 x 149 = 1043 GB.

Am I really losing 120 GB to reserved space for RAID and/or filesystem accounting? I feel like I'm missing something obvious here. Can I get my full terabyte somehow?

What filesystem are you using and how much space does it reserve for Root?
Plus, how much space does the filesystem metadata take up? Perhaps reduce the number of inodes to reclaim some space (Can't do that once there is data on there though)



On my 2.1TB I told mke2fs not to reserve any space for root as I was going to lose about 105MB.


Regards,
Brad
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux