Re: Sanity check installation scheme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 4/15/2004 12:37 AM +0100, robin-lists@robinbowes.com wrote:
Partition | sda          | sdb          | sdc      | sdd      |
----------+--------------+--------------+----------+----------+
        1 | RAID-1       | RAID-1       | swap     | swap     |
          | (/boot, 80M) | (/boot, 80M) | (180M)   | (180M)   |
          +--------------+--------------+----------+----------+
        2 | RAID-1       | RAID-1       | RAID-5   | RAID-5   |
          | (/, 100M)    | (/, 100M)    | (~4G)    | (~4G)    |
          +--------------+--------------+----------+----------+
        3 | RAID-5       | RAID-5       |
          | (~4G)        | (~4G)        |
          +--------------+--------------+

This will give me the following partitions:

/     100MB, mirrored
/boot 80MB, mirrored
/usr, /var, et. All on ~12G RAID-5 array.

Does this look feasible? Can you see any major gotchas? Any better
suggestions?

How about:


Partition | sda          | sdb          | sdc      | sdd      |
----------+--------------+--------------+----------+----------+
        1 | RAID-1       | RAID-1       | swap     | swap     |
          | (/boot, 80M) | (/boot, 80M) | (130M)   | (130M)   |
          +--------------+--------------+          |          |
        2 | swap         | swap         |          |          |
          | (50M)        | (50M)        |          |          |
          +--------------+--------------+----------+----------+
        3 | RAID-5       | RAID-5       | RAID-5   | RAID-5   |
          | (/, ~4G)     | (/, ~4G)     | (/, ~4G) | (/, ~4G) |
          +--------------+--------------+----------+----------+

This will give me the following partitions:

/boot 80MB, mirrored
/, /usr, /var, et. All on ~12G RAID-5 array.
360M swap spread across all 4 spindles

Adjust the capacities to suit.

Alternatively, use the other two spindles "next to" the /boot RAID-1 partitions to provide a RAID-1 or RAID-0 /tmp filesystem. However, I'd be inclined to increase the swap area and use tmpfs (which is virtual-memory based; i.e. RAM+swap) for /tmp.
--
Jeff Woods <kazrak+kernel@cesmail.net>



- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux