RE: Bug in multipath code (Linux 2.6.x) ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Unfortunately very little effort seems to be spent on documenting the features of device-mapper and how to use them. I originally intended to use DM, but since i could not find any information on how to configure mirrored multipath devices i decided against it.

What is the word on MD and DM? I miss some sort of road map and a general overview (preferrably with executive summary). (I am willing to write one if i can find/get the necessary information.)

Regards,
  Dominik 

-----Original Message-----
From: Lars Marowsky-Bree [mailto:lmb@suse.de] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:04 AM
To: Dominik Kubla; Neil Brown
Cc: Dominik Kubla; linux-raid@vger.kernel.org; khoddam@netz.klinik.uni-mainz.de
Subject: Re: Bug in multipath code (Linux 2.6.x) ?

On 2004-04-10T10:11:58,
   Dominik Kubla <dominik.kubla@uni-mainz.de> said:

> Understandable. Maybe the Linux SAN-Alliance should sponsor you a 
> couple of HBAs and a JBOD... ;-)

A lot of work has gone into the Device-Mapper multipath target in 2.6; maybe you should look at that one.


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering	      \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SUSE Labs			      | try again. fail again. fail better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ 	-- Samuel Beckett



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux