On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 02:18:01PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > >One overall comment on merging into 2.6: the patch will need to be > >broken up into pieces. It's OK if each piece is dependent on the prior > >one, and it's OK if there are 20, 30, even 100 pieces. It helps a lot > >for review to see the evolution, and it also helps flush out problems > >you might not have even noticed. e.g. > > - add concept of member, and related helper functions > > - use member functions/structs in raid drivers raid0.c, etc. > > - fix raid0 transform > > - add ioctls needed in order for DDF to be useful > > - add DDF format > > etc. > > > > We can provide our Perforce changelogs (just like we do for SCSI). TA: "you must submit a solution, not just an answer" CALC101 student: "but I've checked the answer, it's OK" TA: "I'm sorry, it's not enough" <student hands a pile of paper covered with snippets of text and calculations> Student: "All right, here are all notes I've made while solving the problem. Happy now?" TA: <exasperated sigh> "Not really" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
