Re: /dev/root (was: Re: Partitioned raid and major number)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>
Subject: Re: /dev/root (was: Re: Partitioned raid and major number)
From: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:05:07 +1100
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
In-reply-to: message from Miquel van Smoorenburg on Tuesday March 9
References: <20040225145624.GA1513@cistron.nl> <16445.12026.812778.621025@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20040226215144.GC11831@drinkel.cistron.nl> <16446.36226.591283.495194@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <16446.39583.968782.41221@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20040227165614.GO23988@traveler.cistron.net> <20040228010916.GC13404@drinkel.cistron.nl> <16450.35269.770163.948225@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20040309153448.GK3084@traveler.cistron.net>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Tuesday March 9, miquels@cistron.nl wrote:
> 
> Mind if I post all three approaches (/dev/root alias device, rootfs, /proc/pid/root)
> to linux-kernel and ask input on what approach is the preferred one ?

Go right ahead.

Thanks,
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- Partitioned raid and major number
  - From: Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Partitioned raid and major number
  - From: Neil Brown
- Re: Partitioned raid and major number
  - From: Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Partitioned raid and major number
  - From: Neil Brown
- Re: Partitioned raid and major number
  - From: Neil Brown
- Re: Partitioned raid and major number
  - From: Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Partitioned raid and major number
  - From: Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Partitioned raid and major number
  - From: Neil Brown
- /dev/root (was: Re: Partitioned raid and major number)
  - From: Miquel van Smoorenburg

Prev by Date: Booting from partitioned raid, do_mounts_md.c patch (was: Re: Partitioned raid and major number)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] md - 1 of 2 - Use "shedule_timeout(2)" instead of yield() as it seems to wait for less time.
Previous by thread: /dev/root (was: Re: Partitioned raid and major number)
Next by thread: Re: Partitioned raid and major number
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID Wiki] [ATA RAID] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Linux Block] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device Mapper] [Device Mapper Cryptographics] [Kernel] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [git] [Yosemite Forum]