Re: Performance difference between two raid0 arrays on same drives?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michel Bellais wrote:

You're right, I thought about it too, but the fastest array is built with partitions closer to the centre of the disk, so it should be the slowest indeed.
The disks are big (180 Gb), the partitions represent less than 10% of it and follow each others. It cannot explain 30% difference in performance.

You can test the performance across your drives with the program zcav (which should come with bonnie++ - if not, take a look at http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/)


--
Mads Peter Bach
Systemadministrator,  Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Aalborg Universitet
Kroghstræde 3 - 5.111, DK-9220 Aalborg Øst - (+45) 96358062
# whois MPB1-DK@whois.dk-hostmaster.dk

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux