Hi All, First I wish to thanks you guys for your answers, I really apreciate. Now I have a question about RAID design. I am trying to implement the best soft RAID system for a samba fileserver as safer as possible. Here is my first idea: 1) Using a small hard drive for the OS (2gigs) plugged as IDE 1 master (won't take part of the raid array). 2) Using two 120 gig for the fileserver in a raid1 array The first one will be as IDE1 slave and the second one as IDE2 master (the cdrom drive will be IDE2 slave). The weakness here will be if the first hard drive with the OS failed. My second idea is: Use only 2 120 gig hard drives and implement a root raid array including the OS. The first one as IDE1 master and the second one as IDE2 master. (The cdrom drive as IDE1 slave). I am not RAID expert but I really don't see the benefits of including the OS in the RAID array as if the primary HD failed, the system won't be able to boot anyway. Am I right ? I mean if the primary disk failed, even if I ask the BIOS to boot the second hard drive, the system won't boot as everything is linked to hda in the system. As you can see I am a little confused about root-raid and the benefits, if someone could give me some advices and tell me which solution is the best I would really appreciate. Thanks a lot and have a nice day. -- Mikael Chambon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
