On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 03:34:49AM -0700, Matt wrote: > raid-level 0 > chunk-size 4 > > Both drives are 80 gig .. so the total comes out to 160 gig w/ raid0 .. Now is > a chunksize of 4k to small (??), or is it optimal (??). Also I'am curios is yes, i definetly think that's too small. try 16, 32, and 64. i'm using 32 w/ reiserfs. the only way to really find the optimal size, is of course to try different sizes timing what you typically use the drives for. > there anyway to change the chunksize w/o lossing the raid array and the > contents inside that array ? nope. -- Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net> DSA Key ID 0xE6CB97DA - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
