Daniel McNeil wrote: > > When we attach drives to an array, don't we already have a module > reference to the md module through the md_fops->owner? No, we could add drives and then leave the md device inactive for some period with drives attached (which allocates memory)...we have to do something to avoid md getting unloaded with the drives attached. > The try_module_get() should be a __module_get() since we better already > have a module reference -- doing a try_module_get(THIS_MODULE) > better not add the 1st reference. Why is that? > Wouldn't another choice be for md_exit() to loop through and drop > all drives that are attached? Yes, that is another option, but presumably you don't want md to get unloaded if you're in the middle of configuring an array... Admittedly, some of these scenarios are a little bit far fetched...but since they can result in a kernel panic or memory leaks, I guess it's better to be safe than sorry. -- Paul > On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 15:00, Paul Clements wrote: > > Neil Brown wrote: > > > > > > On Wednesday April 23, Paul.Clements@SteelEye.com wrote: > > > > Neil Brown wrote: > > > > > It is possible for an array to be half-assembled. To have some drives > > > attached, but not to have been started. > > > This can happen (for example) if you use mdadm to assemble a raid5 > > > array without given all of the drives, and without giving --run. > > > > > > In this case you don't want 'md' to be unloaded, but you haven't > > > loaded a personality module yet. So you need to take a reference to > > > the md module whenever you start putting an md array together. > > > > Ah...I had missed that...appears that was an existing problem, even with > > the MOD_INC_USE_COUNT in place. > > > > So we need to do the ref counting at bind/unbind time, rather than > > activation/deactivation time. > > > > So here's the patch...compiled and tested briefly against > > 2.5.68-bklatest, the ref counting looks correct > > > > -- > > Paul > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > --- linux-2.5/drivers/md/md.c.2.5.68-bklatest 2003-05-02 11:56:18.000000000 -0400 > > +++ linux-2.5/drivers/md/md.c 2003-05-02 13:11:57.000000000 -0400 > > @@ -181,7 +181,6 @@ static void mddev_put(mddev_t *mddev) > > list_del(&mddev->all_mddevs); > > mddev_map[mdidx(mddev)] = NULL; > > kfree(mddev); > > - MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT; > > } > > spin_unlock(&all_mddevs_lock); > > } > > @@ -203,7 +202,6 @@ static mddev_t * mddev_find(int unit) > > mddev_map[unit] = new; > > list_add(&new->all_mddevs, &all_mddevs); > > spin_unlock(&all_mddevs_lock); > > - MOD_INC_USE_COUNT; > > return new; > > } > > spin_unlock(&all_mddevs_lock); > > @@ -1016,7 +1014,12 @@ static int bind_rdev_to_array(mdk_rdev_t > > if (find_rdev_nr(mddev, rdev->desc_nr)) > > return -EBUSY; > > } > > - > > + > > + /* get a module ref if this is the first disk in the array */ > > + if (list_empty(&mddev->disks)) > > + if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) > > + return -EBUSY; > > + > > list_add(&rdev->same_set, &mddev->disks); > > rdev->mddev = mddev; > > printk(KERN_INFO "md: bind<%s>\n", bdev_partition_name(rdev->bdev)); > > @@ -1031,6 +1034,11 @@ static void unbind_rdev_from_array(mdk_r > > } > > list_del_init(&rdev->same_set); > > printk(KERN_INFO "md: unbind<%s>\n", bdev_partition_name(rdev->bdev)); > > + > > + /* drop module ref if this array has no more disks */ > > + if (list_empty(&rdev->mddev->disks)) > > + module_put(THIS_MODULE); > > + > > rdev->mddev = NULL; > > } > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
