Re: XP RAID vs md

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lars Marowsky-Bree on Wed  2/04 17:27 +0200:
> > Wow... I hope that one of the maintainers will comment
> > on this, I didn't even know that XP had a sw RAID
> > implementation. Up to 100% more on read and 60% more on
> > write is quite a significant margin. Is there anything
> > in favour of the md driver if this is true?
> 
> However, with RAID1 for example, I got approximately twice
> the read speed [...]
> 
> I have a really hard time imagining a 100% read boost;
> that would simply exceed disk bandwidth [...]

isn't "100%" the same as double? If you get "approximately
twice" then you are getting 100% already...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux