Hi all,
I need to build a server for an application that does lots of small writes
and some small reads. So far I've build the hardware side of the server,
using an Adaptec 2100S RAID controller and five Fujitsu MAM3184MP. My
original intention was to build a RAID 10 array (RAID0 on two mirror sets
of two disks each with one spare). But performance was very poor with this
setup. I used a custom benchmark which reads and writes 4K blocks in random
locations in a 2GB file (this is very close to the actual application):
Test results for :
Cheap IDE drive: 50 writes/s, 105 reads/s.
MAM3184MP: 195 writes/s, 425 reads/s.
This is as expected. But:
Hardware RAID10 array: 115 writes/s, 405 reads/s.
Which is way slower than a single drive. Now the testing began:
Hardware RAID1: 145 writes/s, 420 reads/s.
Software RAID1: 180 writes/s, 450 reads/s.
Software RAID10: 190 writes/s, 475 reads/s.
Since write performance is more important than read performance, a single
drive is still faster than any configuration using two or four drives I've
tried. So the question is: Are there any tunable parameters which might
increase performance? In theory, read performance on a two-disk RAID1 array
should be almost twice as high as on a single disk while write performance
should (almost) stay the same, and a two-disk RAID0 array should double
both, read and write performance. So the whole RAID10 array should be able
to manage 350 writes/s and 1600 reads/s. What am I missing?
Performance issues aside. If I go for the software RAID10: How can I
configure the system to use the fifth drive as hot spare for both RAID1
arrays? Is it save to add the same drive to both arrays (haven't tried it
yet)? And would you say that software RAID is stable enough to use in a
production system?
Thanks a lot,
Daniel Brockhaus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
