Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: fsck out of memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 06:33, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:

> I've no idea.  Ben has some lb patches up at
> 
>   http://people.redhat.com/bcrl/lb/
> 
> but there's nothing broken out against the latest lbd diffs.

Ugh, that stuff is ancient.

Peter Chubb has a backport of his (very thorough) 2.5 patch to support
large block devices on 32-bit platforms, against much newer kernels
(e.g. 2.4.20) than Ben's stuff.  His site seems to be down, but you
should be able to get it from somewhere under
http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/~peterc/

I haven't used Peter's patch, but a similar patch, developed
independently, definitely allows ext3 filesystems of up to 8TB in size
to work fine on x86, under 2.4.

The nominal limit on device/filesystem size looks to be 16TB on a 32-bit
platform, but there are dozens of sign truncation errors throughout the
VFS and block layers that are unlikely to get fixed.  Hence, 8TB it is.

	<b

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux