Re: RFC - new raid superblock layout for md driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 23:11, Neil Brown wrote:
> This brings up endian-ness?  Should I assert 'little-endian' or should
> the code check the endianness of the magic number and convert if
> necessary?
> The former is less code which will be exercised more often, so it is
> probably safe.

>From my own experience pick a single endianness otherwise some tool will
always get one endian case wrong on one platform with one word size.

> 
> So:
>   All values shall be little-endian and times shall be stored in 64
>   bits with the top 20 bits representing microseconds (so we & with
>   (1<<44)-1  to get seconds.

Could do - or struct timeval or whatever
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux