[snipping CC]
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:05:44PM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> One of the observed issues under raid-tools is not looking at all the
> devices' superblocks. This would allow for out of order initialization.
> Treating the devices as domino chips and stuffing them back in random
> order and it working.
Have you seen this happening? With non-development kernels? ;)
There was one issue with raid startup that wouldn't start up arrays if
the first disk of the array was missing, or something like that. It was
a long-standing bug but it has been fixed.
I have not heard of the problem you're reporting.
>
> If I am wrong here, great. Somebody please make the correction.
Now is the time for someone out there to actually point out that error
which I blissfully ignored and which ruined their TB array of medical
records... ;)
--
................................................................
: jakob@unthought.net : And I see the elder races, :
:.........................: putrid forms of man :
: Jakob Østergaard : See him rise and claim the earth, :
: OZ9ABN : his downfall is at hand. :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
