Re: recovering after a /dev/sda failure on raid1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 12:35:47PM -0600, Maurice Hilarius wrote:
> The Fujitsu disks have a track record of good reliability.
> The IDE disk you mention were discontinued a year ago.
> In our experiences Fujitsu disks have as low a failure rate as can be found.
> Drives we have used with higher failure rates (SCSI) came from IBM and 
> Seagate.
> The best failure rate we have seen is from Hitachi.
> In the case of Fujitsu, Hitachi, and Seagate the rates are very close.
> Quantum/Maxtor SCSI are a bit worse.
> IBM are substantially worse.
> This is based on our DOA and in service SCSI disk failures over the past 
> year.

Thanks for sharing your experience with these brands. It confirms that
Fujitsu remains a good choice. I am in the process of returning the
failed disk and will ask for a full audit of the failure, which I will
summarize to this list when I get it.

Cheers,

-- 
ldm@apartia.org 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux