Re: SV: RAID-6 support in kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > > > RAID-6 layout: http://www.acnc.com/04_01_06.html
> > >
>  > > If it is supposed to survive two arbitrary disk failures something is
> > > wrong with that figure. They store 12 logical sectors in 20 physical
> > > sectors across 4 drives. With two lost disks there are 10 physical
> > > sectors left from which we want to reconstruct 12 logical sectors.
> > > That is impossible.
> >
> > Might be the diagram is wrong.

> Could be the case, so until I find another description I will
> still not know how RAID-6 works.

Below is a (patented?) version that works. This is from the linux-raid list

>  A1   A2  (P1) (PA)
> (P2) (PB)  B2   B1
>  C4   C3  (PC) (P3)
> (PD) (P4)  D3   D4
>
> Disclaimer: I took that from Patent 6,353,895.  If you look it up you'll see
> a lot of different schemes and discussion of XOR-based RAID 6, in language
> disguised as English.  You'll also see that I'm listed as the inventor.
> That's four companies back for me, but my current employer unknowingly
> has some rights to it, so I hope it will see the light of day sometime.
>
> Dale Stephenson
> steph@snapserver.com

-- 
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester

Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux