Re: bad block remapping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Neil,

No I'm not offering; I don't have the skill to do something like that 
though I would offer emotional support and pizza to anyone who could.

-Kanoa

Neil Brown wrote:

>On Thursday May 23, kanoa@cfht.hawaii.edu wrote:
>
>>I have philosophical question about the RAID software.
>>
>
>I think you are right.
>After a read error, the raid system would do well to:
>  read a few other random blocks on the drive
>    (first/last/middle/superblock) to see if the whole drive is dead
>    or not
>  Updates a failed-read-count in the superblock - abort if this fails
>  regnerate the data from redundant info
>  attempt a re-write
>  On success assume the device has coped.
>
>All we need now is code .... are you offering?
>
>NeilBrown
>
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux