On 21.02.2018 10:43, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 09:40 +0100, Georg Chini wrote:
>> On 19.02.2018 15:48, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
>>> pa_sink_get_state() is supposed to be used from the main thread. In this
>>> case it doesn't really matter, because the SET_STATE handler is executed
>>> while the main thread is waiting, but since the state is available also
>>> in thread_info, let's use that. All other modules use thread_info.state
>>> too, so at least this change improves consistency.
>>> ---
>>> src/modules/module-null-sink.c | 2 +-
>>> src/modules/module-pipe-sink.c | 4 ++--
>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/modules/module-null-sink.c b/src/modules/module-null-sink.c
>>> index 25b0f3091..c29722fad 100644
>>> --- a/src/modules/module-null-sink.c
>>> +++ b/src/modules/module-null-sink.c
>>> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int sink_process_msg(
>>> switch (code) {
>>> case PA_SINK_MESSAGE_SET_STATE:
>>>
>>> - if (pa_sink_get_state(u->sink) == PA_SINK_SUSPENDED || pa_sink_get_state(u->sink) == PA_SINK_INIT) {
>>> + if (u->sink->thread_info.state == PA_SINK_SUSPENDED || u->sink->thread_info.state == PA_SINK_INIT) {
>>> if (PA_PTR_TO_UINT(data) == PA_SINK_RUNNING || PA_PTR_TO_UINT(data) == PA_SINK_IDLE)
>>> u->timestamp = pa_rtclock_now();
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/src/modules/module-pipe-sink.c b/src/modules/module-pipe-sink.c
>>> index a2074c1f2..fc909af15 100644
>>> --- a/src/modules/module-pipe-sink.c
>>> +++ b/src/modules/module-pipe-sink.c
>>> @@ -111,10 +111,10 @@ static int sink_process_msg(pa_msgobject *o, int code, void *data, int64_t offse
>>>
>>> switch (code) {
>>> case PA_SINK_MESSAGE_SET_STATE:
>>> - if (pa_sink_get_state(u->sink) == PA_SINK_SUSPENDED || pa_sink_get_state(u->sink) == PA_SINK_INIT) {
>>> + if (u->sink->thread_info.state == PA_SINK_SUSPENDED || u->sink->thread_info.state == PA_SINK_INIT) {
>>> if (PA_PTR_TO_UINT(data) == PA_SINK_RUNNING || PA_PTR_TO_UINT(data) == PA_SINK_IDLE)
>>> u->timestamp = pa_rtclock_now();
>>> - } else if (pa_sink_get_state(u->sink) == PA_SINK_RUNNING || pa_sink_get_state(u->sink) == PA_SINK_IDLE) {
>>> + } else if (u->sink->thread_info.state == PA_SINK_RUNNING || u->sink->thread_info.state == PA_SINK_IDLE) {
>>> if (PA_PTR_TO_UINT(data) == PA_SINK_SUSPENDED) {
>>> /* Clear potential FIFO error flag */
>>> u->fifo_error = false;
>> As remarked by Raman Shyshniou on one of my patches you could use the
>> PA_SINK_IS_OPENED() macro instead of
>> x == PA_SINK_RUNNING || x == PA_SINK_IDLE
>>
>> Otherwise looks good.
> Thanks, I'll send v2 for this patch. I pushed patches 1 and 3 to the
> next branch.
>
Should they not go to master as well?
