On Sat, 2017-08-19 at 17:48 +0200, Georg Chini wrote: > + <option> > + <p><opt>subscribe-signals</opt></p> > + <optdesc><p>Subscribe to signals. Like subscribe, but waits for signals instead of subscription events.</p></optdesc> > + </option> I think it would be better to have the "subscribe" command show both kind of events. > +static void context_signal_callback(pa_context *c, const char *sender, const char *signal, const char *signal_info, void *userdata) { > + pa_assert(c); > + > + printf(_("Signal '%s' from %s\n"), > + signal, > + sender); > + if (signal_info) > + printf(_("Signal Info: '%s'\n"), signal_info); We use the term "signal parameters" elsewhere (and I prefer that term), so I'd like to use the same term here. pulse/subscribe.[ch] seem to use the "signal info" term too, would you mind changing them as well? -- Tanu https://www.patreon.com/tanuk