On Wednesday, 11 May 2016 11:11:19 MSK Matt Feifarek wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Luke Yelavich <luke.yelavich at canonical.com > > wrote: > > > > We would have to get libsoxr into Ubuntu's main repository, which requires > > commitment from Canonical to keep the package up to date, keep an eye on > > bugs, etc. Given that pulse has to be built against libsoxr and must be > > available at runtime, and given we already use speex and are happy with > > the > > default of speex-float-1, the extra effort of supporting another resampler > > when its not our default is probably not worth it. > > Ok, makes sense. But for me, it IS in Ubuntu (though universe, not main?): I think, Canonical only supports main. > I'm interested in quality more than speed, so speex-float-1 (as worst in > the list) doesn't seem what I'm looking for. Does speex-float-10 compare > favorably to the soxr methods? Soxr resamplers typically provide better quality than speex, and are always faster. http://lastique.github.io/src_test/ FWIW, I created a bug to enable soxr resamplers in the official Ubuntu packages. Feel free to add yourself as affected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1574746 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20160511/17ecfc39/attachment-0001.html>
