[PATCH v2 1/6] switch-on-port-available: unify input/output switching policy

[tanuk@xxxxxx (Tanu Kaskinen)]

I don't think there's any reason why the same logic that has
previously added to output profile switching shouldn't be used with
input too.
---
 src/modules/module-switch-on-port-available.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/modules/module-switch-on-port-available.c b/src/modules/module-switch-on-port-available.c
index 6f4c895..e5e1e9d 100644
--- a/src/modules/module-switch-on-port-available.c
+++ b/src/modules/module-switch-on-port-available.c
@@ -56,7 +56,10 @@ static bool profile_good_for_output(pa_card_profile *profile, unsigned prio) {
     return true;
 }
 
-static bool profile_good_for_input(pa_card_profile *profile) {
+static bool profile_good_for_input(pa_card_profile *profile, unsigned prio) {
+    pa_source *source;
+    uint32_t idx;
+
     pa_assert(profile);
 
     if (!pa_safe_streq(profile->card->active_profile->output_name, profile->output_name))
@@ -68,6 +71,14 @@ static bool profile_good_for_input(pa_card_profile *profile) {
     if (profile->card->active_profile->max_sink_channels != profile->max_sink_channels)
         return false;
 
+    PA_IDXSET_FOREACH(source, profile->card->sources, idx) {
+        if (!source->active_port)
+            continue;
+
+        if ((source->active_port->available != PA_AVAILABLE_NO) && (source->active_port->priority >= prio))
+            return false;
+    }
+
     return true;
 }
 
@@ -93,7 +104,7 @@ static int try_to_switch_profile(pa_device_port *port) {
 
             case PA_DIRECTION_INPUT:
                 name = profile->input_name;
-                good = profile_good_for_input(profile);
+                good = profile_good_for_input(profile, port->priority);
                 break;
         }
 
-- 
2.7.0