10.06.2016 22:55, Tanu Kaskinen пиÑ?еÑ?: > There is currently no use for allowing modules to cancel card creation, > and I don't see need for that in the future either. Let's simplify > things by removing the failure handling code. > --- > src/pulsecore/card.c | 7 +------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/pulsecore/card.c b/src/pulsecore/card.c > index 410746b..0ac70b9 100644 > --- a/src/pulsecore/card.c > +++ b/src/pulsecore/card.c > @@ -149,12 +149,7 @@ pa_card *pa_card_new(pa_core *core, pa_card_new_data *data) { > } > > pa_card_new_data_set_name(data, name); > - > - if (pa_hook_fire(&core->hooks[PA_CORE_HOOK_CARD_NEW], data) < 0) { > - pa_xfree(c); > - pa_namereg_unregister(core, name); > - return NULL; > - } > + pa_hook_fire(&core->hooks[PA_CORE_HOOK_CARD_NEW], data); No opinion here. Maybe the new code is OK, or maybe an assert should be added so that it is explicit that the hook is not expected to fail. > > c->core = core; > c->name = pa_xstrdup(data->name); > -- Alexander E. Patrakov