On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 17:18 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote: > This addresses Tanu's comments from the first series. I've squashed a > bunch of stuff that I thought made sense, and for some additions, I've > split out into new patches for easy review. I think it's fine to have it > this way since we'll be merging it all together anyway. > > One thing I would welcome is patches, or even suggestions, of bad JSON > strings that we should be able to handle. It's quite easy to just throw > them into the test suite. > > I've also verified that both json-test and format-test are valgrind > clean. Since I didn't find any other problems than the trivial-to-fix string parsing issue (plus an issue with the first patch using pa_json_object_free, which was added in the last patch), I made the modifications myself and pushed these patches to "next". Thanks for the patches! --Â Tanu