On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 09:36 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On 24 January 2016 at 22:00, Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk at iki.fi> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 13:06 +0530, arun at accosted.net wrote:
> > > @@ -253,7 +263,7 @@ void pa_webrtc_ec_play(pa_echo_canceller *ec, const uint8_t *play) {
> > > Â Â Â Â Â pa_assert(play_frame.samples_per_channel_ <= webrtc::AudioFrame::kMaxDataSizeSamples);
> > > Â Â Â Â Â memcpy(play_frame.data_, play, ec->params.priv.webrtc.blocksize);
> > >
> > > -Â Â Â Â apm->AnalyzeReverseStream(&play_frame);
> > > +Â Â Â Â apm->ProcessReverseStream(&play_frame);
> >
> > This looks like a potentially unrelated change. Why is this change
> > done?
>
> It is needed for the intelligibility enhancer to work, but I later
> realised we don't actually support this -- unlike
> AnalyzeReverseStream(), ProcessReverseStream() modifies the playback
> samples. This is something that needs to be done in the future
> (there's a later commit that disables this that I could not squash due
> to some intermediate changes).
Does that mean that the intelligibility enhancer feature doesn't work
at all? In that case this patch should be dropped.
--
Tanu
