Thanks for your enthusiasm, Let me know when you get around to it! -Chris On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk at iki.fi> wrote: > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 11:11 +1100, Chris Billington wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I was wondering if anyone has had the time to look at my patch? > > > > No rush if there are more important things to be doing! > > I haven't had time yet. I will get to it eventually. > > > > The other four patches are implementing the setting of individual > latency > > > offsets of sinks and sources. This now plays nicely with port latency > > > offsets. The way I've done this is to rename everything pertaining to > the > > > latency offsets inherited from ports, so that they are all called > > > sink->port_latency_offset etc. Then I've introduced a new latency > offset > > > for sinks and sources, called just sink->latency_offset etc, which is > for > > > the latency offset set on that sink or source alone. The total latency > > > reported by the device then includes the sum of both of them. > > Sounds very good. > > > > The only thing I didn't do was restoring from disk. Tanu, you said this > > > might be tricky, but I wasn't able to understand module-device-restore > > > enough to even see the trickiness you were talking about, I wasn't > able to > > > get that far! I'm not very familiar with the codebase - I'm just here > > > selfishly to try and get my feature in so my application works better > :p. > > > So apologies for that, I hope the changes are worthy without it. > > I think it's ok to leave the persistence feature out. > > -- > Tanu > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20160202/757ad700/attachment.html>
