On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 10:37 +0200, Erotavlas_turbo at libero.it wrote: > Hi, > thank you for your reply, but you answered only to one of my doubts. By using > the same OS, I compiled both pulseaudio 5.0 and pulseaudio 6.0 from source with > the following command line: > ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --disable- > bluez4 --disable-rpath --with-module-dir=/usr/lib/pulse/modules Where did you get this command line? It's exactly the same as what another person recently reported using. I presume the command line is from some kind of a howto document. The arguments are mostly nonsense, so if you can tell the author of the howto to fix the arguments, that would be very helpful. You don't necessarily have to give any options to configure. --sysconfdir=/etc is probably a good idea, because if you use the default (/usr/local/etc), you probably will forget that, and get confused when changes to the files under /etc don't have any effect. And if you don't want to use bluez4, disabling that is ok too, but not required. > The results is that pulseaudio 5.0 has 23 modules while pulseaudio 6.0 has > only 13 modules. Why? I don't know. In your original mail you said that PA 6.0 installed module-bluetooth-discover, but not module-bluetooth-policy. How are you checking what gets installed? There should be no situation where module-bluetooth-discover gets installed, but not module-bluetooth-policy, so your installation seems to be broken somehow. > 1) Is there a way to choose which modules to install? The various --enable/disable-foo configure parameters control what optional features get enabled. There's no way to specify "this is the exact list of modules I want". > 2) Is it right that the resampling profiles src-sinc-best-quality src-sinc- > medium-quality src-sinc-fastest src-zero-order-hold src-linear are deprecated > since pulseaudio 6.0? Yes. > 3) When building from source is option --enable-neon-opt Enable NEON the only > performance improvement that I can enable? Do you expect that there would be more "performance improvement features"? Of course we enable all applicable performance improvements automatically. NEON is an exception, but I don't know why that's an exception. You didn't mention your hardware - is it even NEON capable? -- Tanu
