01.02.2015 03:43, Georg Chini wrote: > + /* Minimum number of adjust times + 1 needed to adjust at 0.75% deviation from base rate */ > + min_cycles = (double)abs(latency_difference) / u->adjust_time / 0.0075 + 1; > + > + /* Rate calculation, maximum deviation from base rate will be less than 0.75% due to min_cycles */ > + new_rate = base_rate * (1.0 + latency_difference / min_cycles / u->adjust_time) + 0.5; What's the aim here with min_cycles? Why not just clamp new_rate post-factum to 0.75% vicinity of base_rate, as this is done in the 2â?° case? -- Alexander E. Patrakov
