On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:07 PM, David Henningsson <david.henningsson at canonical.com> wrote: > > > On 2014-09-22 20:58, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >> So, if I understand correctly, the current situation is the following: >> >> 1. oFono patches have been fully merged. >> 2. Wim Taymans patches have not been merged yet (or at least not >> completely) >> 3. Even if Wim's patches are merged, we (debian) will have to choose >> between oFono or native at compile time. >> 4. Either patchset is not complete, in that one supports HSP and the other >> HFP. >> 5. In practice, the above is not terribly important, because most >> devices support both. >> 6. oFono requires manual configuration by the user. >> >> With the above understanding, I'm thinking that we could work around >> problem 3 by building pulseaudio twice and shipping the relevant >> modules in separate conflicting packages. Not sure if that would be >> too confusing for users. > > > I have had the same thought (shipping one pulseaudio-module-bluetooth and > one pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-ofono) for Ubuntu, maybe we can collaborate > on the packaging? I'd be more than happy. It appears that the packages have diverged quite a bit, so we need to work something out (but perhaps that is OT for this list?). Our current packaging is maintained in git[1]. We use the regular git-buildpackage workflow. I'm not finding where the equivalent repository is for Ubuntu (does one exist?). [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-pulseaudio/pulseaudio.git -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
