On 2014-09-22 20:58, Felipe Sateler wrote: > So, if I understand correctly, the current situation is the following: > > 1. oFono patches have been fully merged. > 2. Wim Taymans patches have not been merged yet (or at least not completely) > 3. Even if Wim's patches are merged, we (debian) will have to choose > between oFono or native at compile time. > 4. Either patchset is not complete, in that one supports HSP and the other HFP. > 5. In practice, the above is not terribly important, because most > devices support both. > 6. oFono requires manual configuration by the user. > > With the above understanding, I'm thinking that we could work around > problem 3 by building pulseaudio twice and shipping the relevant > modules in separate conflicting packages. Not sure if that would be > too confusing for users. I have had the same thought (shipping one pulseaudio-module-bluetooth and one pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-ofono) for Ubuntu, maybe we can collaborate on the packaging? > If ofono requires manual configuration (and does the ofono support > have a minimum version requirement? Debian currently has 1.9), I think > it would be better for us to use the native backend, if it manages to > be upstreamed in time. Same here, my vote is for trying to get the native support in ASAP and before 6.0 release. -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. https://launchpad.net/~diwic
