On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 08:35 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Sun, 2014-11-02 at 20:18 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 22:17 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > > On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 12:10 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 05:30 +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > > > > The use case that this patch is made for seems such that there shouldn't > > > > be any jack state conflict to worry about in the first place, though. To > > > > me "dock headphone" and "built-in headphone" seem like obviously > > > > separate paths, so I think we should reflect that in our configuration > > > > by creating a new path file. > > > > > > Ah now I remembered why i didn't do that in the end (i started with two > > > different path files). It's because with the default setup on the X220 > > > you can't mute/disable the two paths seperately. > > > > What do you mean by "the default setup"? Is there some non-default setup > > where they can be separately muted? > > By default setup i mean the setup of the card when booting a linux > kernel without patches or any user pin configuration. Iotw the setup > most people are running. > > You can make them seperately mute when e.g. reconfiguring the dock > headphone jack as a line-out (see the patchset i sent this weekend for > some fixes when that's done) or potentially by changing things around in > kernel. E.g. either by auto-muting one of the hp's or exposing a control > for it. If the hardware supports it, I think it's a kernel bug if the kernel doesn't expose separate mute controls for both jacks. -- Tanu