On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 22:17 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 12:10 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 05:30 +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > > > > > > On 2014-10-24 22:33, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > > > In case there are two independent jacks for one port (e.g. Dock > > > > Headphone Jack and Headphone Jack), the availability ends up being > > > > incorrect for one of the first was _NO (not plugged) and the second gets > > > > _YES (plugged). Also pulse complains about the state being inconsistent > > > > which isn't true. > > > > > > > > Fix this by preferring higher states (_YES > _NO > _UNKNOWN) > > > > > > Thanks, I agree with this conclusion. I didn't really know what to do > > > with one jack being yes and another being no, but the above reasoning > > > makes sense. > > > > > > I'm not sure I'm happy with just a simple ">" comparison - in case we > > > add more jack states in the future, they might not fit with the ">" > > > scheme. But maybe we should deal with that when the problem comes and > > > just take your patch as-is now. What do other people think? > > > > I'd prefer replacing the ">" comparison with something else too. > > > > The use case that this patch is made for seems such that there shouldn't > > be any jack state conflict to worry about in the first place, though. To > > me "dock headphone" and "built-in headphone" seem like obviously > > separate paths, so I think we should reflect that in our configuration > > by creating a new path file. > > Ah now I remembered why i didn't do that in the end (i started with two > different path files). It's because with the default setup on the X220 > you can't mute/disable the two paths seperately. What do you mean by "the default setup"? Is there some non-default setup where they can be separately muted? -- Tanu
